Mergers and Acquisitions

30th April 2012

Failure to minimise control impact of rights issue receives frosty response from Takeovers Panel

By Kobi Devenish, Rachel Launders

Guidance Note 17 – Rights Issues (GN 17) sets out the approach adopted by the Takeovers Panel (the Panel) in relation to rights issues that have the potential to affect control. The recent decision by the Panel in Real Estate Capital Partners USA Property Trust [2012] ATP 6 (Real Estate Capital Partners), in which a declaration of unacceptable circumstances was made, has confirmed the approach of the Panel as set out in GN 17 and reinforced the need for directors to take all reasonable steps to mitigate the potential control impact of a rights issue.

30th April 2012

Special dividends – sweetening the deal

By Peter Feros, Dragan Misic

The payment of special and ordinary dividends prior to completion of public company takeovers has been a common theme in many recent transactions. A significant attraction for shareholders is the opportunity to access franking credits in the target which, in certain circumstances, may not be of significant benefit to an acquirer (eg private equity fund acquirers and non-residents in treaty countries which benefit from low or nil dividend withholding tax rates).

30th April 2012

M+A Perspectives – April 2012

In this month’s edition we consider the benefits of paying a special dividend in the context of a public M&A transaction, and highlight the Takeovers Panel’s continuing interest in rights issues that may have an impact on control.

29th March 2012

Bridging the price gap – the rise of contingent consideration?

By Alex Brown, Sarah Duerdoth

Despite the recent improvement in Australian M&A activity, a number of strategically sensible transactions are still not getting done because of the inability of the parties to agree on price. In recognition of these volatile economic times acquirers will often take a conservative approach to placing value on the future performance of a company, while target companies are still trying to achieve the highest value for their shareholders, leading to a potential price gap between the parties.

29th March 2012

We’re the regulators and we’re here to help – capital raising for small to mid cap companies

By Jordan Kent, Rachel Launders

Recent moves by the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) will make it easier for small to mid cap companies to raise equity.

29th March 2012

Takeovers Panel upholds importance of Truth in Takeovers without chilling the auction in Ludowici Limited

By Rachael Bassil, Peter Cook, Nirangjan Nagarajah

The Takeovers Panel’s recent decisions in the matter involving Ludowici Limited serves as a timely reminder to all takeover participants of the importance of taking care with public statements in relation to a takeover bid or scheme of arrangement.

29th March 2012

M+A Perspectives – March 2012

In this month’s edition we consider the Takeovers Panel’s most recent comments on “Truth in Takeovers” in the context of a live auction, promising signs from ASX and ASIC for fundraising by small to mid cap companies, and recent trends in the use of contingent consideration in control transactions.

29th February 2012

Current developments in Australia’s foreign investment rules

By Deborah Johns, Kirish Kularajah

After two years at $231 million, the standard monetary threshold for notifiable transactions has increased to $244 million. Recent controversy around acquisitions by foreign persons of agricultural land in Australia has once again put Australian foreign investment rules into the spotlight, potentially impacting M&A activity in both the agribusiness and mining sectors.

29th February 2012

Not all pills are poisonous – the Takeovers Panel decision in RCL Group Limited

By David Clee, Alex Kauye

The recent decision of the Takeovers Panel (Panel) in RCL Group Limited (RCL Group) has put “poison pills” back on the radar. In RCL Group, the Panel declined to conduct proceedings in relation to the operation of a contractual right given to Torchlight Real Estate Fund Limited (Torchlight) under the terms of its corporate facility agreement with ASX-listed, RCL Group Limited (RCL).

29th February 2012

Recent trends in hybrid securities and the key legal issues

By Adam D'Andreti, Janine Ryan

There has been a strong resurgence in the hybrid securities market, which had been largely dormant since the onset of the GFC, with a number of recent issues by financial issuers (including ANZ, Westpac and Colonial) and corporate issuers (including Woolworths, Origin Energy, Tabcorp and AGL Energy).

29th February 2012

M+A Perspectives

In this month’s edition we consider the strong resurgence in the hybrid securities market in Australia, recent comments on “poison pills” by the Takeovers Panel and current developments in Australia’s foreign investment rules.

14th February 2012

State of the M&A Nation: Our 2012 forecasts

Following summer holidays, the Australia Day long weekend – and the sporting delights of the Australian Open final and the test series – it’s time to roll up the sleeves and return to business in earnest. The question then, is what does 2012 hold for the Australian M&A market? It’s no easy question, given the twists and turns of local and international economics, politics and financial markets of recent times. Indeed only one thing is certain: nothing is certain.

30th November 2011

Material adverse change conditions in an increasingly uncertain world

By David Clee, Kate Merrifield

Recent times have been challenging to say the least.

30th November 2011

ASIC relents on celebrity photo bans and ASX asks for criminal background checks on directors – recent developments affecting companies proposing to list

By Adam D'Andreti, Ilona Roze, Rosamond Sayer

ASIC’s new guidance on prospectus disclosure
On 10 November 2011, ASIC released Regulatory Guide 228 Prospectuses: Effective disclosure for retail investors (RG 228) following industry consultation on draft guidance set out in Consultation Paper 155 (CP 155)1. The new regulatory guide contains the most comprehensive guidance provided to date by ASIC on how it will interpret [...]

30th November 2011

Revised ASIC policy on downstream acquisitions: The path is becoming clear but no less treacherous

By Alex Kauye, Neil Pathak

In our April edition of M&A Perspectives we discussed some recent Takeover Panel cases (eg ACS/Hochtief/Leighton) and some interesting potential transactions (CGNPC Uranium/Kalahari/Extract) concerning downstream acquisitions.

31st October 2011

M+A Perspectives – October 2011

In this month’s edition we consider the state of play in LBO finance markets, recent changes to ASIC’s regulatory guidance on schemes of arrangement and a recent judicial decision which provides guidance on the ability of responsible entities to unilaterally amend scheme constitutions.

31st October 2011

State of play in LBO finance markets

By Hiroshi Narushima, John Schembri

The ongoing fragility of the global economic recovery and credit markets has continued to restrain deal flow in the Australian private equity market in 2011.

31st October 2011

Managed investment schemes update: constitutional amendment power confirmed

By Bob Ker, Adam Laura

The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) permits the responsible entity (RE) of a registered managed investment scheme to unilaterally amend the scheme’s constitution if the RE reasonably considers that the change will not adversely affect members’ rights.

31st October 2011

ASIC updates guidance on schemes of arrangement

By Nirangjan Nagarajah, Carmen Wong

On 22 September 2011, ASIC published its revised Regulatory Guide 60 (RG 60) that outlines its approach to schemes, following industry consultation and an internal policy review since the last update in 2009.

30th September 2011

M+A Perspectives – September 2011

In this month’s edition we consider the composition of classes for schemes of arrangement, the recent run of ‘hostile’ bids and issues relating to them and the recently announced changes to the foreign investment approval process for the acquisition of mining exploration projects by SOEs.

30th September 2011

Schemes of Arrangement: the Question of ‘Class’

By Jordan Kent, Rachel Launders

One of the most difficult issues that arises in a scheme of arrangement (whether used to acquire control of a company or to effect a demerger) is the determination of whether any group of shareholders should be treated as a separate class for the purpose of voting on the scheme.

30th September 2011

War then peace: seizing control when playing nice just doesn’t work

By David Clee, Alex Kauye

In recent times, we have seen a number of high profile bids announced without the support of the target company. The most notable of these are the current bids for Macarthur Coal and Foster’s. Traditionally, these have been known as ‘hostile’ bids. However, bidders nowadays are sure to distance their bid from any suggestion of hostility, with public statements focusing on delivering value to target shareholders and emphasising a willingness to work with the target to successfully execute the bid.

30th September 2011

Foreign investment in exploration and development projects – shifting the goal posts for SOEs

By Alex Brown

In a recent press interview the Federal Treasurer, the Honourable Wayne Swan MP, announced a significant departure from the existing policy in respect to the investment by SOEs in Australian mining exploration companies.

31st August 2011

M+A Perspectives – August 2011

In this month’s edition we consider debt funding for takeover bids, commercial and legal issues relating to the recent run of joint bids in Australia and insider trading issues associated with block trades. We also take a look at G+T news and recent deals G+T has been advising on.

31st August 2011

Considering a block trade? When too much information can be a problem

By Rachael Bassil, Adam D'Andreti

The $3.3 billion sale by Royal Dutch Shell of part of its shareholding in Woodside, and the complete exits of Nine Entertainment Co. and the Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board from their investments, respectively, in carsales.com and Transurban, demonstrate that block trades remain a viable option for substantial securityholders who are looking to sell down their investment. In each of those trades, the broker managing the sale also underwrote it.

31st August 2011

Joint bids: a cure for the pre bid jitters?

By Alex Kauye, Neil Pathak

There is no doubt that M&A transactions are taking longer and are harder to complete these days. The difficulties can arise in many different shapes and forms. Bid funding can be hard to obtain, the perceived risks can be high, regulatory issues can get in the way and significant shareholders may not be sellers. What is the panacea for these problems?

31st August 2011

Debt funding for takeover bids: how certain do the funds need to be?

By David Clee, Peter Cook, John Schembri

A feature of Australian M&A activity in calendar year 2011 has been the comeback of the takeover bid as a preferred means for effecting significant public corporate control transactions.

29th July 2011

M+A Perspectives – July 2011

In this month’s edition we consider the state of the M&A Nation at the halfway point for 2011, underwriting for a rights issue and the Takeovers Panel’s decision in Viento Group Limited 02 [2011] ATP 12.

29th July 2011

The state of the M&A Nation: 2011 mid year report card

Having reached the halfway point for 2011 it is an opportune time to reflect on the year to date and crystal ball gaze into the rest of the year.

29th July 2011

Swim between the flags – safe underwriting for a rights issue

As the Australian credit market has not yet returned to the buoyant state enjoyed prior to the global financial crisis, companies continue to explore rights issues as a way of raising funds. Given the potential change of control impacts associated with a rights issue, listed companies need to consider how to structure any underwriting of a rights issue to avoid an application to the Takeovers Panel (the Panel) to prevent the transaction.

29th July 2011

The Year of Living Dangerously: the run of association cases before the Takeovers Panel continues

By David Clee, Alex Kauye

The remarkable run of association cases before the Takeovers Panel this year has continued into July, with the Panel now having considered no less than seven alleged instances of undisclosed associations in 2011.

30th June 2011

M+A Perspectives – June 2011

In this month’s edition we consider the decisions of the Takeovers Panel in oOh!media and Premium Income Fund and ASIC’s Consultation Paper 159, which proposes amendments to ASIC’s policy regarding shareholder approved acquisitions.

30th June 2011

Alleged associations and warehousing in the curious case of oOh!media

By David Clee, Alex Kauye

Background

In the March edition of M+A Perspectives, we looked at the decisions of the Takeovers Panel in Viento, Brockman and CMI which shed some light on when the Panel will, and will not, infer that an association exists. Since that time, the Panel has considered several more allegations of undisclosed associations, including those relating to ComOps and Bentley Capital. The latest of these is the curious case of oOh!media, a Panel proceeding which related to complicated call option arrangements.

30th June 2011

Shareholder approved acquisitions: revised ASIC guidance

By Nirangjan Nagarajah, Neil Pathak

ASIC has recently re-written its long outdated Regulatory Guide 74: Acquisitions approved by members. It has released a revised draft regulatory guide as an attachment to a consultation paper giving the market an opportunity to comment on its proposed new guidance.

30th June 2011

Premium sale! Limited time only! Will not be extended!

By David Clee, Tim Gordon, Madeleine Kulakauskas

In Premium Income Fund [2011] ATP 10, the Takeovers Panel made a declaration of unacceptable circumstances in relation to ALF Finance’s conditional off-market bid for all of the units in Premium Income Fund (PIF). PIF is listed on the National Stock Exchange (NSX). Its responsible entity is Wellington Capital.

31st May 2011

M+A Perspectives – May 2011

In this month’s edition we consider updates to the Takeovers Panel’s policy on frustrating action, recent practice for improving scheme consideration close to the shareholder meeting, restraints of trade in management equity plans following the Warburton case and independent expert’s reports for trust schemes.

31st May 2011

The best of both worlds: independent expert’s reports for trust schemes following revisions to guidance note 15

By Tim Gordon

After consultation, the Takeovers Panel (Panel) has released amendments to guidance note 15 (GN15) which sets out the Panel’s approach to the use of trust schemes to effect mergers by listed trusts and managed investment schemes.

31st May 2011

Competing during the restraint period: restraints of trade in management equity plans following the Warburton case

By Rachael Bassil, Alastair Corrigall

James Warburton was employed as chief sales and digital officer at Seven Media. An opportunity arose to move across to Network Ten (Ten) as chief executive officer. Mr Warburton accepted that position on 2 March 2011, intending to commence his new role on 14 July 2011.

31st May 2011

A stitch in time? Improving scheme consideration close to the shareholder meeting

By Andrew Crook, Adam D'Andreti, Bryan Pointon

A Part 5.1 scheme of arrangement recently proposed by Redflex Holdings Limited (Redflex) has raised for consideration the possibility that bidders who seek to obtain control of a company by way of a scheme may have flexibility to improve scheme consideration shortly prior to the meeting of shareholders without delaying that meeting. While this approach has not recently been approved by a court, it offers the potential for schemes to become a more flexible takeover device.

31st May 2011

Takeovers Panel liberates targets from the bear hug

By Nirangjan Nagarajah, Neil Pathak

The Takeovers Panel recently reissued its guidance note 12 on frustrating action. The revised guidance note clarifies that the policy does not apply to schemes and formulates a limited ‘put up or shut up’ rule for Australia.

20th April 2011

ASIC releases revised regulatory guides on expert reports: just fine tuning or a major overhaul?

By Rachel Launders, Christoph van Opstal

On 30 March 2011, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) updated its Regulatory Guides on expert reports.

20th April 2011

M+A Perspectives – April 2011

In this issue we consider the downstream acquisitions exception to the 20% takeover prohibition, the Takeovers Panel’s decision in BC Iron Limited, two key developments affecting equity capital raisings and ASIC’s recent amendments to Regulatory Guides 111 and 112.

20th April 2011

ECM update: new ASIC prospectus guidance and the emergence of the PAITREO

By Peter Cook, Adam D'Andreti

In recent weeks, two significant developments of relevance to Australian equity capital markets have taken place. On 12 April 2011, ASIC commenced a consultation process to finalise its policy concerning ‘clear, concise and effective’ prospectus disclosure and has published a draft regulatory guide which contemplates a number of changes to current market practice. In March 2011, Origin Energy Limited’s (Origin) capital raising utilised for the first time a new form of accelerated renounceable entitlement offer structure, which potentially overcomes some of the perceived disadvantages previously suffered by retail shareholders.

20th April 2011

BC Iron: scheming to terminate a scheme – best to disclose your rights to make them iron-clad

By Nirangjan Nagarajah, Neil Pathak

Regent Pacific’s proposed acquisition of BC Iron (BCI) by scheme of arrangement illustrates some of the key differences between the regulation of takeovers and of schemes of arrangement.

20th April 2011

Swimming downstream can be more difficult than it sounds: the practical operation of the downstream acquisitions exception

By David Clee, Alex Kauye

As we know, Australia has come through the global financial crisis better than most and we are in the midst of another resources boom. These happy coincidences have resulted in some instances where a key asset of a foreign company has been its controlling or substantial shareholding in an Australian listed company.

17th March 2011

M+A Perspectives – March 2011

In this issue we consider recent Takeovers Panel decisions in Northern Energy, Viento, Brockman and CMI. We also take a look at G+T news and recent deals G+T has been advising on.

17th March 2011

Suspicious conduct: associations or just mere coincidences in Viento, Brockman and CMI?

By David Clee, Alex Kauye

M+A practitioners will agree that in recent times control transactions can take longer and can be more difficult to complete. In this context, it may come as no surprise that some may seek to consolidate control by novel ways and others may seek to challenge conduct they regard as suspicious.

17th March 2011

Northern Energy: due diligence bid conditions and expert’s reports

By Rachel Launders, Neil Pathak

Northern Energy Corporation’s defence of the hostile bid by New Hope Corporation resulted in New Hope taking Northern Energy to the Takeovers Panel for alleged deficiencies in Northern Energy’s target’s statement and the independent expert’s report.

4th March 2010

Short selling – established regulatory regime

By Alastair Corrigall

The Australian regulatory environment for the short selling of shares has been significantly altered since September 2008.