Cookies Disclaimer

This site uses cookies to analyse traffic, remember your preferences, and optimise your experience.

Skip to main content
Navigate to the Gilbert + Tobin Homepage
Navigate to the Gilbert + Tobin Homepage
  • Option
  • Option - Consequat incididunt ad incididunt enim reprehenderit
  • Option
Navigate to the Gilbert + Tobin Homepage
  • Our people
    • Agribusiness
    • Consumer and Retail
    • Defence
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Government
    • Healthcare and Life Sciences
    • Infrastructure
    • Metals and Mining
    • Private Capital
    • Professional Services
    • Real Assets
    • Social and Impact Investing
    • Superannuation
    • Technology
    • Transport and Logistics
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Banking and Finance
    • Capital Markets
    • Charities and Not-For-Profit Law
    • Climate Change and Sustainability
    • Competition, Consumer and Market Regulation
    • Corporate Advisory
    • Cyber Security
    • Disputes and Investigations
    • Employment
    • Environment and Planning
    • Financial Services Regulation
    • Foreign Investment in Australia
    • Fund Formation
    • G+T Innovate
    • Intellectual Property
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Native Title, Heritage and Agreements
    • Privacy and Data
    • Private Capital
    • Pro Bono
    • Projects and Construction
    • Real Estate
    • Restructuring Advisory
    • Tax
    • Technology and Digital
    • Ventures and Startups
    • Digital infrastructure in Australia
    • Takeovers and schemes review 2026
    • Australia’s new merger regime
    • Beyond transition: shaping Australia’s energy future
    • Financial services regulatory reform
    • Sustainability Insights
  • News
  • Contact us
Insights

Federal Court rejects Optus's privilege claim over Deloitte report

Date published 22 November 2023
Read time TBC
Are cyber breach investigation reports produced by external consultants protected by legal professional privilege? What do courts consider when deciding whether investigation reports are privileged? In the recent decision of Robertson v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 1392, the Federal Court of Australia found that a forensic investigation report produced by Deloitte (Deloitte Report) following the cyberattack on Singtel Optus and its related entities (Optus) was not protected by legal professional privilege.
 

On this page navigation

Share

Share on LinkedIn Email article

Related services

Privacy and Data Disputes and Investigations Cyber Security
Get in touch
Contact us
Gilbert + Tobin acknowledges Australia’s First Nations peoples as the Traditional Custodians of this land. We pay our respects to Elders, both past and present, and extend that respect to all First Nations peoples across these lands.
  • Subscribe to our content
  • Manage your subscription
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Standard Terms of Engagement
  • AML/CTF reform – our approach
  • Modern Slavery Statement
  • Whistleblowers
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
© Gilbert + Tobin 2026